Thursday, October 15, 2009

New news

Is no news good news? For me, usually no. So in the hopes of creating a new beginning of sorts, I am returning to my little green blog. No longer a wedding info site. Now it's a real online journal! For a while...

New developments:

Sad stuff:

My stepfather died almost two months ago and because of this things have changed around here. I miss him terribly, more than I had imagined. And had I imagined what it would be like because he was very ill... My mother is staying with us. Not sure for how long. Maybe forever? Hmm. I love her dearly but it has been hard. We're in "adjustment mode."

Good stuff:

Ian has started shooting interviews for his long awaited, very exciting, Peter Ivers doc. Yay!

I am (sort of) studying for the GRE and getting ready to apply for a new MA program at USC...

I'm also fresh from to back to back MB projects, one in Vilnius, Lithuania and the other in NY. Check them out!

Also, two more in the works: Broke People's Baroque Peoples' Theater at GrandArts in KC, MO and a series of performances and video installation for MOCA's 30th Bday party...

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Where we are.

Ian and I are staying at the London House Bed & Breakfast Saturday and Sunday nights. Here is a map.

Also here is a map of the Mill and the Music Centre.

Friday, July 24, 2009


210 Queen Street West
Toronto, ON

Sandy & Jenny's Loft

- Upstairs from the Queen Mother Cafe



Two nights before our wedding in Guelph, we are having a fun BYOB cocktail/dance party at our friend's loft in downtown Toronto to celebrate with our friends from Canada, NYC, Los Angeles and Europe, who will probably only be in the same place this one time... so in the words of Kevin Rowland and his group Dexys Midnight Runners (and The Emerald Express)... "Let's Make This Precious"!

Monday, July 6, 2009

Toronto Travel Tips From Anne Marshall

Thanks Anne!

Here's what she wrote...

Link to article about my neighborhood:

and here's the earlier one that gives a good rundown of things to do on a short trip to Toronto:

The other Toronto "musts" I would personally recommend are:

- Kensington Market (and Chinatown) - particularly Jumbo Empanada and King's Cafe for the vegetarians

- The Bata Shoe Museum on Bloor, just west of University (around the corner from the ROM) - the world's only footwear museum, and it's amazing how much you learn about a civilization from its shoes

- Casa Loma (truly awesome grande olde mansion, totally decadent turn o' the century living)

- The TTC - especially riding the streetcar along Queen from the Beaches to the Roncesvalles turnoff - takes 90 minutes for the entire journey and you see the entire city for $2.75 - if you buy a day pass you can hop on and off for something like $6

- shopping on Queen between Bathurst and Trinity Bellwoods Park at Gore Vale (Sandy's old street)

- Roncesvalles from Marion up to Howard Park (little Poland, and fun shopping)

and finally, MY NUMBER ONE RECOMMENDATION FOR YOUR GUESTS WHO WANT TO RECOVER FROM FRIDAY NIGHT'S FESTIVITIES and a truly great time in the late afternoon-early evening in the summer in Toronto:
- Gypsy Jazz at the Communist's Daughter, 1149 Dundas St. West (just west of Ossington) Saturdays 4:30 - 8:00 pm - amazing Django Reinhardt-style quartet plays classic standards and jazz stuff, fronted by our friend Michael J., a singing, trumpet-playing bartender who performs as he waits on your table and uses the drink shaker as percussion. NO COVER but they do pass the hat.

Nighttime recommendations: good, non-shitty dancing fun on Saturday night can be found in various places.

at The Boat (158 Augusta Ave.)
at Neutral (349A College St. - entrance on Augusta)

at Wrongbar (1279 Queen St. West at Lansdowne)
at the Drake

IN "DUNDOSSINGTON" (Sandy's coinage, we like it)
at The Sparrow (92 Ossington halfway between Queen and Dundas)
at The Dakota Tavern (to live country/rock/soul, my favourite live venue & my friends' place, 249 Ossington just north of Dundas, diagonally across from the best tiny bar in Toronto, The Communist's Daughter)

My favourite restaurants in the city for vegetarians:
- Fresh (three locations - Spadina at Richmond, Bloor at Spadina, and Queen at Crawford)
- King's Cafe in Kensington Market
- Live on Dupont (raw food place)

Great Brunch Places:
- Easy (Queen and Roncesvalles)
- Universal Grill (on Dupont, just a block north of Bloor & Ossington)
- The Swan (892 Queen W. at Crawford)
- The Queen Mother (not my favourite food-wise, but right below Sandy's apartment, literally - and they do greyhounds by the pitcher)

and for a rollicking pre-wedding treat on Sunday, the Bluegrass Brunch at the Dakota tavern starts at 11 am and is amazing for both food and music

Hope this is helpful! Tell anyone you want that they can always call me if they need help or directions or recommendations of any kind.

love, Anne xoxo

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

rental car...

This Canadian independent site is a lot cheaper than Priceline or Hotwire. Even with tax these come out to under $25/day:

more B&B info

The other B&B's in town are most easily and centrally listed with

Thursday, June 25, 2009


Hello Wedding Invitees:

We have had a lot of inquiries about gifts for our upcoming wedding. We haven’t registered anywhere, partly because we are traveling to our own wedding and cannot really accommodate any gifts in our luggage and also because we already have a house full of everything we want or need here in Los Angeles. What we would really like is to take a trip together to the British Isles next June; something we’ve always talked about doing in our nine years together but haven’t been able to afford. Our plan is that we take our time, drive around the countryside from place to place and stay in nice ‘olde’ inns and things like that. So, we have opened a special savings account for this purpose and we would be very pleased and appreciative to accept gifts toward our belated-honeymoon fund. We know that a lot of you are traveling from far and wide to attend our wedding, so we are considering that to be a priceless gift in itself, but if you are still planning to give us something, helping to make this long-awaited voyage a reality would be a gift we would truly enjoy and cherish forever. Presentations will be accepted at the wedding reception or you can write to make other arrangements.


Ian & Jade

Friday, June 5, 2009

Link to book directly online at Holiday Inn Guelph

Book a room at the Holiday Inn Guelph using the Gordon Marshall Wedding group rate.


Or Call: 519-836-0231

Make sure you give the event code "GMW" and get the group rate ($104.99).

Book early to get rooms facing the pool / atrium area. There are other rooms that are less nice outside of the atrium tower and in the interior section of the building.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Wedding Info!

Wedding weekend July 24-26, 2009 schedule:

The wedding is at 3pm on Sunday the 26th, in Guelph at the Goldie Mill, 75 Cardigan Street. Reception will be next door at the Guelph Youth Music Centre...

We are going to have a big, co-ed bachelor/bachelorette dance party Friday night, the 24th, at our friend, Sandy Gordon's loft in downtown Toronto on Queen Street. All are welcome. We will post exact address and directions soon.

Saturday the 25th, Jade and Ian will be driving to Guelph for last minute preparations. Guests can choose to stay in Toronto for city sightseeing on Saturday or drive to the Guelph-area to see some of the Canadian countryside.

So, a great way to do the weekend would be to arrive in Toronto by Friday the 24th, come to the party at Sandy's and stay the night in Toronto. Saturday is a "free day" ideal for sightseeing around Toronto, Guelph or other parts of Southwestern Ontario (see below). One could stay the night in Toronto or Guelph on Saturday; they are 50 minutes apart, so it is possible to spend the day in Toronto and the night in Guelph and be well sorted for the wedding! You will want to stay in Guelph on Sunday night; the reception will run pretty late and there will probably be some of you who might want to go out afterward. Guelph is a fun college town with lots of bars.

There is a very popular outdoor music festival, Hillside Festival, with tons of bands (folk-oriented) happening at Guelph Lake all weekend; Buffy Sainte-Marie is headlining Saturday night. It is close to sold out, but if you act now you may be able to get tickets (try Craig's list, too). There are artisans selling stuff, a good organic-type food expo and Canadian adventure hippies in droves for your amusement.

If you're not getting a rental car and need to figure out how / when to get to Guelph, we are working on coordinating travel for the guests between Toronto and Guelph using carpooling or perhaps a rental passenger van. More on that later, but let us know if this is an issue for you and we'll be sure to help work something out.


We recommend Toronto Pearson YYZ



Holiday Inn Guelph 80s Atrium style w/ pool, hot tub, sauna & gym; short, convenient cab ride to the wedding venue & downtown. Literally across the street from the giant, government-run liquor store and the mall- where you can score some food-court poutine!

They are giving us a special group rate of $104.99 Canadian per room (two double beds or one Queen with pull out); it doesn't matter if there's 1 or 4 of you in a room, the rate stays the same; so this can be done on the cheap if you Koozie and Skeleton Boy-types shack up together! We will have a direct link with the rate and everything set-up very soon, but if you want to book early you can call (519) 836-0231 and tell them you are with the Marshall-Gordon wedding w/ a special rate of $104 (as per Melody Lau). That's a bit less than 100 in US dollars; for you thrifty ones, split four ways it will probably run you 25 bucks a piece. Book sooner than later, especially if you're planning on staying Saturday the 25th night in Guelph. It's unlikely that Sun the 26th will sell out, but book in advance to be sure and get the cheap rate.

Delta A Brand new hotel close to our wedding venue.

Ramada Inn Guelph We heard they may be having a room sale if you book soon. Recently renovated and probably the closest of the three.

All of these are a cheap cab ride from the wedding venue / downtown Guelph (ie $10 or less).

Here are a couple of other links to hotels in the area:

Canadian Hotel Guide
Guelph B&Bs


Literally stumbling distance from our pre-wedding party Friday night and in the middle of a fun/hip shopping area. This Hilton is on Peter Street; the other Hiltons are far away and not ideal.

Drake Hotel

A busy, very trendy hotel with a good restaurant. Kind of like The Standard (LA) or The Gramercy (NY) of Toronto. A short cab ride from Sandy & Jenny's pad.

Gladstone Hotel
Recently remodeled, very pretty place in fun area. Karaoke Saturday night! Right next to The Drake.

Royal York
If you want to go fancy and historic; think The Park Plaza... also a quick cab ride from Sandy's.

Some of you poor Angelenos / New Yorkers may want to consider staying the Toronto night(s) at Sandy & Jenny's place, they have room to sleep about 8 and have kindly offered to accommodate some of you... so let us know and we'll pencil you in.

Here are some links to some pretty towns nearby that are worth visiting if you are sick of the urban grind (and if you're renting a car):

Closest to Guelph, a very pretty town and home to the famous Elora Gorge and waterfalls. Spend the day tubing down the river. Fun and Relaxing! Bring your swimsuit!

Niagara Falls/Niagara-On-The-Lake (where they filmed The Dead Zone!)
A little out of the way, but an international tourist destination which takes about 90 minutes to get to from Toronto or Guelph (it's like a triangular trip, dude!)
See the falls and/or take a death-defying, wet ride on a jetboat! Eek! Fun!

St. Jacobs
Nice Mennonite town! Yummy baked goods, antiques, etc. 30ish minutes from Guelph.


Picturesque theatre town with lots of little artsy shops and restaurants! About an hour past Guelph (heading from Toronto).

It's a bit of a hike, but the most beautiful place to visit would be the Muskoka region and the lovely lakes up north (near Georgian Bay) if you want to make the extra effort.

More info to come!!!! Keep checking back for further details...

xoxoo J & I

Sunday, April 5, 2009

More info to come!

I'm about to transform my blog into something new! Please check back for important wedding related updates! xo Jade

Thursday, November 27, 2008

hey stranger

Wow it's been like, nine months since I've posted anything. I've been very busy. More will come after upcoming trips to Miami and Cairo. I'll be done with school and have a little room to breath. Today is Thanksgiving. We're going to Polka, my favorite Polish restaurant. It'll be low stress, hopefully. Wait, I'll be with my family... Never mind. Be back soon with project updates. xo J

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Louise Brooks

G.W. Pabst’s, Pandora’s Box (1929)

In 1929, after an extensive search throughout Europe, German Expressionist filmmaker, G.W. Pabst finally found his star. Louise Brooks, a 20-year-old American ex-Ziegfeld Follies dancer would breathe hot life into playwright Frank Wedekind’s iconic character, Lulu. The story would revolve around this stunning nymph, a doomed Lolita who inadvertently destroys herself and those around her. In Richard Leacock and Susan Woll’s 1984 documentary, Lulu in Berlin, 78-year-old Louise Brooks explained that in Europe, Pabst had been unable to find a “true beauty” to play Lulu. “There simply were none.” Marlene Dietrich had been slated to play the part but Pabst was unsatisfied, considering her too old and jaded (at 25) to appropriately fit his vision of the character. Dietrich, while glamorous and lovely, projected a world-weary cynicism in her performance style that would have been inappropriate for the role. Pabst saw in Brooks a guilelessness juxtaposed with an intense sexual energy. With her modern, iconic look, a boyish black pixie cut, languid figure, and sparkly eyes, Brooks was “a natural” who would only need to exude the inherent feminine buoyancy she already possessed.

In his plays, Erdgeist (1895) and Die Büchse der Pandora (1904) Wedekind told the story of Lulu, the naïve femme fatale, so gorgeous and magnetic that no man or woman could resist her charms. She unknowingly cast a sexual spell on everyone she came into contact with, yet involvement with her inevitably caused certain death and total destruction. In Pandora’s Box, Pabst conflated Wedekind’s plays into a lushly melodramatic black and white silent film. Louise Brooks’ presence onscreen oozed a sexual energy that was alternately girlish and predatory. His film, composed and shot in the Expressionist style, was a searing social critique dealing with issues of class, gender, and female sexuality. The film told the story of a charming, high-class courtesan to whom everything came easily. It was revealed, as the tale unfolded, that she had come from nothing to become the object of every man’s desires. She was financially supported by a wealthy doctor and was loved by both he and his young handsome son. Lulu hadn’t a care in the world and in fact, seemed emotionally vacant. She breezed through life seemingly unaffected by the romantic trauma she inflicted on those around her. Ironically, in the end, Lulu was murdered by the only man she was ever able to feel true sexual desire for.

In Pandora’s Box, Pabst and Wedekind offered a cautionary tale about the dangers of female sexual freedom. They endowed Lulu with a dangerous weapon and turned it backwards upon her. In these men’s eyes, woman was either an innocent and sexually desirable child, or a man-eater, or both. She was evil even if she didn’t mean to be. If she unleashed her sexual energy she would cause pain and eventually be punished for her “sins.” Against a backdrop of this troubling yet visually striking and attractive tome of misogyny, Pabst and Wedekind condemned the decadence of high-class German society by having the elite male and female characters travel seamlessly between their glittering world of champagne and tuxedos and the slimy depths housing criminal activity, gambling, and prostitution.

Pandora’s Box was a study in dichotomies in its aesthetic style, story, and characterizations. The film was shot in rich, glowing lights and darks. Predating and inspiring the Film Noir style of the 1940s crime drama, Expressionist filmmaking utilized ultra-theatrical lighting effects. Shadows were void black, sequins on a gown sparkled with a blinding intensity, and seedy streets were steamy and dim. This cinematic technique served as a storytelling mechanism. The shadows and light informed the audience of the moral value of a location and its inhabitants. In Pandora’s Box, the crisp modern interiors stood in stark contrast to the damp London streets or the floating, rag tag gambling den Lulu ended up in following her fall from grace. The sets and lighting subtly illustrated to the audience, without words, Lulu’s downward spiral.

The costumes were another gorgeous and informative element in this film. Lulu’s dresses reflected her condition throughout the piece. In the beginning of the picture, we saw her in white silk chiffon, the garb of a purely innocent girl-child. Later, on her wedding day, she wore a sleek white satin gown that glimmered in the light. In the courtroom scene, she seemed to have on an identical dress but this time in black. The black satin exposed a moral shift while maintaining the elegant sophistication of her elevated social position. Finally, in her last days alive she appeared in a dull, grubby gray dress, texturally the opposite of all of the previous fabrics. The lackluster rags she wore mirrored her tattered emotional state.

Pabst used character archetypes in the story as well. The players in the film were divided and placed in contrast to one another. In keeping with Expressionism’s frequent use of mirrors as symbols, Lulu’s homeless, elderly father seemed to reflect her dark inner soul. He was ugly while she was beautiful. He was as old as she was young and blossoming. She was bubbly and spontaneous while he was creaky and conniving. Pabst employed this approach with his other characters, the rich doctor whom Lulu married and murdered was cynical, dark, hardened, and emotionally guarded, while his son, Lulu’s lover Alwa, was vulnerable, young, handsome, romantic, and ultimately too weak to save her.

These mirroring effects were common in the Expressionist style. Elements were exaggerated and distorted to reveal the deeper value and truth of a work. By employing these kinds of stylistic tactics, Pabst created an exemplary example of Expressionist art. The costumes, lighting, and scenery added to his perfectly crafted aesthetic vision. Louise Brooks offered a personal style and charisma that continues to compel audiences. Her energy and creative focus distilled the character to its base elements and made the vampish Lulu a beautiful and moving portrayal of a doomed human being. Brooks was able to transcend any misogynistic shackles that were place upon her through the sheer force of her personality. In Pandora’s Box, Brooks exuded an intelligence rarely seen in any of today’s screen beauties.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

"free time"

I've been so busy, nonstop, for the past year I'm going a little crazy having this "free time". So far I've finished two books, planted a tomato and herb garden, gone to a physical comedy/clown workshop, done make-up for a friend's photo shoot, and spent hours wasting away over the keyboard. Yet why is it that when I have all this time to work on projects alone I still feel paralyzed and like I'm not doing enough??

Here's a list of things I want to do in the next several weeks:

Clean the house -- for real.
Make some costumes. I have big plans for an Afghani Nomad Dress in all the colors of the rainbow...
Make some collages with the images I've been collecting over the past couple of years.
Learn how to edit on the computer.
Make some 5 minute short videos.
Catch up on some reading.
Go to Reno to visit my dad.
Go to NY.
Go to SF and Humboldt County.

Whew, see why I'm having an anxiety attack? Now instead of doing anything productive, I'm going to see a silly movie.

I'm gonna try not to
feel guilty about it.

Thursday, June 7, 2007


Haven't blogged in so long. I'm enjoying my summer vacation. Still have to go to work a couple days a week, so it's not a total vacation, but I do have much more free time now that my semester is over.

I did some gardening the other day! So nice. I love the way potting soil smells. I planted some lavender in our window boxes as well as some bright fuchsia geraniums. I tried to nurse some of my neglected house plants back to life. I re-potted all of them. They look great and should start thriving again soon. My dream is to cover our entire living room with hanging plants and ferns. Increase the oxygen, you know. Pretend I'm an elf living in the rain forest.

I went to the dentist today. Found out I had a cavity and had to get a very expensive filling. Boy do I wish I had dental insurance. It cost me three hundred bucks! Sheesh. I'd rather pay now than later though if you know what I mean.

Went to the Eden's Edge show at the Hammer yesterday. Anna Sew Hoy's work looked great. Also got to see my friend Matthew Monahan's drawings and sculptures. Amazing. I really liked Liz Craft's funny bronze hippie sculpture a lot, too.

MB has a video installation up at the Steve Turner Contemporary right now. If you want to check it out it's at 6026 Wilshire Blvd. across from LACMA. We're in the show, Past Over, with Mary Kelly and Sam Durant.

This Sunday I'm doing a physical comedy and clown class.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

My Report on Ridiculous Theatre

Outrageous! And By the Way, Is Female Ridiculous?

Before his death in 1987, Charles Ludlam created a vast body of work and an important artistic and social legacy. He fashioned incandescent, sometimes frightening, always outrageous, cultural events through his individualistic performance style and craftsmanship of over two-dozen plays. Unlike many of his contemporaries in the experimental theater scene, his written work has had a life beyond the initial shocking performances; Ludlam’s ghost lives on. Inspired by his irreverent self-confidence, tenacity, and groundbreaking artistic vision, Ludlam continues to be a vibrant role model for subversive theater artists. Many of his plays are still being performed twenty years after his death. Ludlam’s genius was in his excavation of the dregs of popular culture and his effortless process of wittily combining them with themes (and dialogue) drawn from classic works of literature and theater. In addition to his invaluable contribution to the modern theatrical tome, Ludlam was also an activist, incorporating powerful sexual identity politics into his absurd physical comedies.
Charles Ludlam, dynamic performer and prolific playwright of over 29 plays produced successfully Off-Off-Broadway between 1967 and 1987, sprang full grown from the tripped-out, radical head of 1960s-era Greenwich Village. Ludlam was part of the psychedelic stew that included experimental filmmaker Jack Smith and seminal Pop Art legend Andy Warhol. In 1967, Ludlam was fired from his own play, Conquest of the Universe by Warhol’s in-house Factory theater and film director, John Vacarro. Ludlam and Vaccaro had been working together on the play at what was then known as The Ridiculous Play-House, it was Ludlam’s first starring role and playwriting debut. Other cast members included underground actresses Ultra Violet and Mary Woronov, as well as other lesser known “Superstars” from Andy Warhol’s art films and John Vaccaro’s experimental theater productions.

After a particularly vicious fight one night, Vaccaro had had enough of Ludlam’s arrogant behavior. At the Ridiculous Play-House, Vaccaro had given Ludlam freedom onstage he’d never had before. Classically trained as a theater major at Hofstra University, Ludlam had performed in college productions as well as in Summer Stock plays, yet he’d always stuck out as a ham; too campy, pasty, and over-the-top to be considered a “good” actor. An artist himself with an eye for talent and a taste for weirdness, Vaccaro had encouraged Ludlam to go crazy onstage, act as freaky as he could. This released him from the shackles of naturalistic Method acting that he had always despised. By portraying “unbelievable” characters or performing in drag, he felt he was enabling a new kind of communication between the actor and the audience. Because Ludlam’s fans knew that he was being honest with them, he wasn’t trying to trick them into believing he really was the character he was playing, their sense of suspended belief was heightened. If the audience could be moved by his emotional depiction of a female Camille, the result in turn would be doubly impactful. Finally, Ludlam could go beyond what reality dictated and create far-out, truly exciting, new work. As it turned out, Vaccaro may have felt he had given Ludlam too much freedom, for in his mind, he was becoming a little too big for his britches. In order to maintain control of the production and the playhouse, Vaccaro, in a dramatic gesture, threw Ludlam’s ass out of the theater. Surprisingly to both of them, most of the cast left too, in solidarity.

Perhaps what inspired this rebellious exodus was Ludlam’s intense charisma and explicit artistic vision. He knew he was pushing the limits of fashionable experimental theater. He possessed an excitement that was missing from the cynical, hipper-than-thou, underground milieu. His adventurous peers gravitated towards him because he was crafting a new genre. Ludlam’s praxis was to become a hybrid of the discarded, underappreciated cast-offs of popular culture. His revelatory, re-valuing process would turn out a theater of pastiche. Ludlam became an archivist, an alchemist, combining trash, glamour, and humor with radical sexual identity politics. With his courageous collaborators, he would revolutionize underground theater; celebrate, reject, and redefine traditionally held concepts about gender roles in performance, and bring irreverent comedy into the political theatrical arena.

Holed up in one of his fellow actor’s tiny New York apartments, the diva and his defectors formed a rag tag little performance troupe, The Ridiculous Theatrical Company. Ludlam and his gang felt emboldened to steal the Play-House’s name because they, as a group of actors, more accurately represented the original theater’s anarchistic ideals. Bizarrely, Vaccaro continued with rehearsals of Ludlam’s play at the still functional Ridiculous Play-House, recasting it with other Factory folk. A short time after forming the Ridiculous Theatrical Company, Ludlam too, mounted a competing production of the play. The observant few noted the new title, wondering if it may have been a reference to the two flamboyant gentlemen's final showdown.

Being the only member of the group with any experience in writing, directing, or acting, Ludlam took on the role of leader of the performance troupe. Over the course of the following twenty years, Ludlam would write, direct, and star in all of the company’s productions. The colorful ensemble consisted of men and women: heteros, homos, and hippies. They shared a love of “low” popular culture, mostly old, “B” movies from the 1940s and cheap, melodramatic horror flicks; anything “trashy” and under-valued by mainstream “straight” society. At the same time, they were mesmerized and thoroughly impressed by the likes of Shakespeare, Moliere, and traditional Opera. By adopting, adapting, and combining the unwanted and the venerated into comedic masterpieces, Ludlam created a sparkly new universe, an absurd mix of intense performed sincerity, elevated emotion, soaring camp, and preposterous hilarity, he created Ridiculous Theater.

Ridiculous Theater used a hedonistic, anarchistic approach in line with hippie attitudes of freedom, excess, and lack of censorship. It was an attack on the normative condition. The personal (homosexuality, drag performance, gender bending) became a political, theatrical statement of pride and independence. Owning and expressing it created a sense of empowerment. Humor became the ultimate hedonistic enjoyment. The audience’s laughter came in response to this illicit entertainment. It was a camp celebration of everything glittery and gold. By adopting the aesthetic of kings (or queens, more aptly) the artist became one.

Ludlam crafted his productions by skillfully spotting what each of his actors’ strengths and weaknesses were and writing roles to suit them. Because of the utilization of this artistic strategy, the company resembled an early Italian Commedia Dell’Arte troupe, with each actor often playing a specific “stock” (or type) of character. It is important to note that a specific goal of Ludlam’s was to afford himself and his actors the opportunity to play any and every character that had ever existed in the history of literature and theater, whether they were male or female. Ludlam and his collaborators shared this playful aesthetic, simultaneously subversive and entertaining. By breaking all theatrical conventions, making everything ridiculous, they were able to critique a society that had, up to this point, oppressed them.

The company members shared an appreciation for excess and glamour and a general disdain for conceptual art. In a sense, they were rebelling not only against an uptight, conservative mainstream culture, but also against the established, avant-garde art world itself. The Ridiculous Theatrical Company was the ultimate outsider, creating work that was the antithesis of Minimalism, the fashionable aesthetic of the era. Ludlam and his comrades felt that art, political performance, and painting in particular, were becoming homogenized. Everything was grey, beige, black, or white and he wanted purple, pink, and turquoise. A close friend of Ludlam’s coined a term that seemed to sum up his process, “Virtuoso Maximalism", “Concept and execution is academic. Going crazy and committing an atrocity is actually more modern…Today’s avant-garde makes art respectable but doesn’t give us anywhere to go."

In terms of performance style, the actors’ technique was broad, expressionistic, and exaggerated, almost clownish. This placed them out of reach of traditionally held concepts of “good” or “bad” acting. The company spoke a shared vernacular of an experimental, artistic, and sexual underground. They collectively knew what was funny, hip, shocking, and boundary breaking, and they integrated it all into a brainstorm of ideas that would fly around the theater during their creative/creation sessions. Ludlam possessed the masterful skill of being able to sweep up these glittering images, caricatures, sight gags, and campy one-liners swirling around and encapsulate them into a well written, perfectly timed farce. A key element of the collective’s work and Ludlam’s personal aesthetic was the utilization of drag in almost every performance. Ludlam claimed that his personal process was to first actually become an actress then embody the character he was to represent onstage.

Ludlam’s decision to incorporate drag into his company’s aesthetic and productions was troubling to some members of his mixed straight/gay, male/female audience. The cultural temperature of the era made some feminists question whether or not drag was indeed a drag for women. Ludlam had an acute awareness of the political ramifications of this. In response to the skeptical, feminist questionings that were bubbling up along side his experimental productions, Ludlam explained that what he was doing was exposing and deconstructing the oppressive attitudes that existed regarding the assumed sacredness of women. If woman is something sentimentalized, put on a pedestal, she cannot ever be considered truly equal. In addition to this, Ludlam also insisted that if a man can adopt and display the outward, feminine characteristics of a woman: hair, make-up, dress, it shows that these attributes are not actually what constitutes being a woman. Ludlam points out that gendered behavior is a construct. As discussed in Ronald Argelander’s 1974 piece in The Drama Review, the androgynous sexual role-playing the company performed freed the actors to explore their own sexual personas onstage. In the Ridiculous Theatrical Company, men and women both had free reign to explore their own multifaceted identities. This freedom of performance removed any and all limitations of their fantasy lives. The actors were free to explore and act-out, without societal or conventional theatrical constraints.

In further discourse on the subject, Ludlam also pointed out there is a stigma against showing “female” emotions because being a woman is not valued by the patriarchy. By dressing up as a woman and acting like a woman, he was exposing this taboo, making it ridiculous. Drag historically has been used as a means of eliciting derisive humor. Normally, it is used as a way to show how impossible it is for a man to successfully portray a woman. In the Ridiculous Theatre, while there was laughter, it was not mocking or contemptuous. Instead, it was a celebration of social freedom and larger-than-life femininity. In his essay on Ludlam, Ronald Argelander observed that the company members, “entertain the idea that strict biological/social sexual division may be a cruel joke that nature/society is playing on humanity. For them, and in their performances, pan-sexuality is a reality."

Female members of the company often portrayed male characters. Ramona Malone, the actress known as Black-Eyed Susan and a long-time collaborator of Ludlam’s, often played young boy roles and Lola Pashalinksi, wanting to recreate an interesting male character she had observed in an old Hollywood film called, The House on 92nd Street, embodied the meta-theatrical Mysterious Mr. Christopher, a female character who dressed in men’s clothes. These are examples of female-to-male drag, but what about female-to-hyper-female impersonation? This concept was often present in Ridiculous Theater, an exaggerated representation of extreme female-ness portrayed by women themselves. This stems from the same desire women and men have to capture and express an amplified, fantastical reality. By encouraging men and women both to explore the panoramic proportions of their own gendered identities, the artist redefines the audience’s sense of reality as well as critiquing and possibly altering society’s norms.

In his first drag performance directed by John Vaccaro, Ludlam reached back further back in time to portray another one of his other female obsessions, silent film star, Norma Desmond. Again, speaking with Dan Isaac in 1968, Ludlam said the character of Desmond, “Sprang from Zeus, totally formed…I put the wig on and POW! There was Norma." Drag freed Ludlam from the constraints of naturalism. By “becoming” a woman, he was allowed to show “female” emotions, and in effect, create a universality of expression. Presenting these cross gendered characters and shunning the naturalistic Method acting technique was a way for Ludlam to reach further than what realism normally allowed. Within the playful, imagined world they constructed, the tacky and mundane became astonishing. Early on in his training in the Method technique, Ludlam realized that he was expected to “not to do anything extraordinary. The problem was that everything (he) was interested in was extraordinary." The Ridiculous Theatrical Company gave him a living venue for this innate need to create something supernatural and bizarre. Naturalism was oppressive.

Although he specifically claimed he and the Ridiculous Theatrical Company were not political theater, they did alter their world for the better by positively influencing the young men and women who made up their audiences, as well as the new generations that are discovering his work today. If he had lived through the decadent 80s, Ludlam would have realized that he had a hand in changing the world, or at least the world of experimental theater. In his drive to constantly create innovative performances, Ludlam and the Ridiculous Theatrical Company broke down socially constructed sexual identity barriers, paving the way for future artists and redefining drag performance. He and his female collaborators simultaneously fought for gay and feminist rights in a most delicious, entertaining, shocking, and beautiful way. Through their use of physical comedy and humor, the male and female, gay and straight members of the collective created a universal, community-driven model of performance.

Sunday, April 8, 2007

Project Report

We're starting a new project....
"My Barbarian: Gods of Canada II" for The Biennale de Montréal 2007 :

Three new flags are on the horizon. Shopped for parachute-pant -nylon and other flag-making materials, construction starts tomorrow.

Later in the evening, we travel to the City of Orange for another collaborative session with undergraduate art and drama students at Chapman University. In addition to the performance our group's been discussing, we've guided them through a creation of a giant wall co
llage. I brought in a bunch of 70s magazines and clippings to add to the stuff the kids delivered. The collage is bizarre but pretty amazing. Since the "religion" they're re/creating for the project is eco-centric, the left over semi-psychedelic imagery from these magazines really works.

We're bringing a bunch of donated rags to the session tomorrow night. The costumes will be Godspell/Sid and Marty Kroft/Mummers inspired. The parade will be filmed without sound. Original music will be recorded and added later.

Thursday, April 5, 2007


British brutality rules!

It's almost 3 AM. I'm awake because earlier this evening I drank too much Darjeeling tea. Before trying to go to sleep, Ian and I watched the first episode of the BBC mini-series, Elizabeth R from 1971, starring a radiant Glenda Jackson, fresh-off-of-Ken Russell's-1969-masterpiece, Women in Love. Yay! Now that we've finished the I, Claudius series it'll definitely be my new fav.

So, it's appropriate that I'm sitting down to discuss British playwright, Sarah Kane's first play, Blasted. OK wow. Bloody Hell! I mean, literally it depicts a bloody hell... and I loved it.

Kane is what's known currently as a "Brutalist" playwright. She's part of a new school of British writers that grew up during Thatcher's reign of terror in the 1980s. Nihilistic and spare, it knocks your teeth right out from the first line. Normally I'm pretty squeamish about rape, war, semen, and things viscerally disturbing and scary. I could never watch this if it were a movie. I'm all about lace, roses, and pretty 1920s clothes when it comes to visuals, but somehow I'm drawn to sparse, violent literature. Kane reminds me of the grim, postmodern, bitchy authoress, Mary Gaitskill or of some short stories collected in the High Risk series.

Written in 1995, when Kane was a young, severely depressed 24 year-old, Blasted depicts a "theater of catastrophe." A dying, racist, 45 year-old asshole journalist rapes and generally abuses a young woman. Mid-way through the piece a soldier breaks into the hotel room they're staying in, an explosion occurs, and things degenerate into a complete war-zone. More rape, blood, guts, masturbation, icky food, and dead babies abound until you think you just can't take it any more. The play ends on a desperate, subtle note. Kane offers a tiny touch of human kindness and it's done.

Not to sound like a cliche, but in a time of war, this kind of art is especially effective. Kane has likened an individual act of brutality, one rape, to war as a whole and it really works. She committed suicide in 1999 at 28.

Now I can go to sleep... maybe.

Sunday, April 1, 2007


Casual coven gathering last weekend.

Lara with the newest member of the group, Tingri.


Friday, March 23, 2007

PROG BLOG: we need the goddess...

PROG AND OTHER ENJOYABLE MUSIC is a blog I've recently stumbled upon and (desperately) want to like. It could possibly be an endlessly helpful and enlightening source for obscure music. I've bookmarked the page in hopes that I could use it as a handy reference tool while searching the net for avant garde musical tidbits. While on I'd casually click over for a daily tip. I don't think it's gonna happen...

The guy (and I'm assuming he is a guy because the site absolutely lacks any Yin presence at all, aesthetically or in content) seems to be pretty knowledgeable about progressive rock music but he's missing something very important: the female vibe. It's what makes this kind of experimental music magickal and hip. It's the velvet, tie dye and glitter, the high notes warbled into a acid infused landscape of purple feathers and willow trees. You need a WITCH to cast the spell, man!

Everything he's chosen to discuss on the site, from heavy Caravan rotation to early Super Tramp, embodies the extreme nerdyness that has tainted Prog's name over the years, at least the years I've been around, paying attention to music. What saves progressive rock and makes it exciting for me is dark, quirky, feminine sex appeal. Here are a few of my favorite Ladies of Prog who posses it:

Dagmar Krause of Slapp Happy

Renate Knaup of Amon Duul II

and Gilli Smyth of GONG

more to come on this subject...

Saturday, February 3, 2007


I've finally switched to Mac and it's been quite an adventure so far. Right now I'm transferring my Harvest Records box set. It's going to make it much easier to listen to the damn thing. The package is completely unmanageable and there are no song listings on the individual CDs. Being able to see the artists alphabetized will be great!

Here's a list of some of the artists on my iTunes so far:

Kevin Ayers
The Move
Roy Harper
Syd Barrett
Mister Yellowman
Billy Bragg
Jorge Ben
Captain Beefheart
Stephen Bishop
Yoko Ono
Soft Machine
Francoise Hardy
Babe Ruth
Dr. John
Steve Reich
...and much more to come.

Friends out there: expect a mixed CD soon.

Thursday, February 1, 2007

New Weird Amsterdam

I met a man last week in the Netherlands who invited me to see his experimental music group, Oorbeek. They played a live broadcast on Radio Rietveld, at the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. My friends and I sat on the floor of a darkened gallery and watched this mild mannered European transform into a mad conductor. Twisting his body, lifting his legs in the air, and shaking his fists, he attempted to control a cacophonous orchestra made up of visual artists, an ethnomusicologist, a filmmaker who runs a festival in Uganda, and a Dutch throat singer. He played a silver horn and waved his hands around, inviting chaos and conjuring an image of the Sorcerer's Apprentice.

The music is wholly improvisational but he assures me there are rules, a method to their sonic madness. Recently they planned a recording studio session at which they would each play every instrument for exactly one minute and hope for positive results. The objects responsible for the honking, clanking and clonking include a wild noisy trumpet, multiple mouth-bows, guitar, bass, drums, scotch tape, Iranian drums, and otherworldly vocals. The sound simultaneously makes one imagine ancient machines, scary monsters screaming, as well as James Chance, a saxophone player who was part of New York's early-eighties No-Wave scene. He played a combination of improvisational jazz-like music and punk. Oorbeek appropriately calls its brand of sound "New Weird Amsterdam".

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

rehearsal pix

From last night's rehearsal. We leave tomorrow.

Monday, January 22, 2007

Puppeteer entertaining a handicapped child. Drawing by Michael Hsiung



Fri, 26 Jan; Sat, 27 Jan
20.00 hr (8:00 PM)
De Appel, Amsterdam NL

My Barbarian - Voyage of the White Widow

The LA-based performance collective My Barbarian debut Voyage of the White Widow, a site-specific spectacle developed for de Appel. Since its founding in 2000, the exuberant group My Barbarian has created a furore, presenting unusual shows with a high camp and rock content. Voyage of the White Widow may be interpreted as a 'play' of the kind described by the Dutch historian Johan Huizinga in his influential publication Homo Ludens (1938). A number of 'sailor personages', the crew of a nameless ship, express through play-acting and song their attitude towards a patchwork of historical events. They refer both to the Dutch Year of Catastrophe (1672) and to what My Barbarian calls the recent 'Catastrophic Years' in the United States. In this way the troupe seeks to de- and remythologise the consequences of European colonial expansion, economic phenomena such as the trade in marihuana, ecological disasters past and present, such processes as immigration and tourism, and the value, both artistic and monetary, of Dutch art of the Golden Age. Against a backdrop featuring Jan van Wijckersloot's Allegory of the French Invasion of the Netherlands in 1672 (1672) and Willem van de Velde's Gust of Wind (1650) - from the collection of the Rijksmuseum - the performers present themselves as 'fools', facetiously commenting on numerous historical and present-day trends and events.

Ticket sales (9.00 EUR) via the ticket service of De Brakke Grond: 31 20 626686, or at the door from 7pm on the evening of the performance